I love this! The former Commanding General of the United States Army is coming out and saying explosives brought down the towers, a plane did not hit the pentagon and THE PRESS IS NOT FREE BECAUSE THEY ARE TOLD WHAT TO SAY.
SUCK ON THAT NAYSAYERS!
This is just another example of a prominent figure who is speaking the truth and making your petty, irrational arguments and lousy debuning look even more pathetic.
Major General Albert N. Stubblebine is a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy (West Point, class of 52) who enjoyed a distinguished 32 year career in the U.S. Army.
He retired as the Commanding General of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM).
In is last assignment, retired Major General Albert N. Stubblebine was responsible of all of the army’s strategic intelligence forces around the world. He had responsibilities for the signals intelligence, photo intelligence, counter-intelligence and human intelligence.
“I do not believe the free press is free anymore [...] The press is saying what they have been told to say about this. Now do I have proof about this? No. But I believe that all the stories that were told about 9/11 were false.”
— Major General Albert N. Stubblebine III
Prior to this assignment he commanded the US Army Electronics Research and Development Command (ERADCOM). During his active duty career he commanded soldiers at every level. One of his experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s imagery interpretation for scientific and technical intelligence during the Cold War. Among his other accomplishments, he participated in a special task force which defined the requirements of the U.S. Army for future conflict.
He is a long-term out-of-the-box thinker who redesigned the U.S. Army’s Intelligence Architecture while serving as the Commanding General of the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. This intelligence restructuring earned him his place in the Intelligence Hall of Fame.
Major General Albert N. Stubblebine doesn’t believe in the official conspiracy theory put forward by the Bush administration and has been a 9/11 Truth defender for many years. In a recent interview, he mentions “you look at the buildings falling, they didn’t fall down because of an airplane hit them, they fell down because explosives went off inside. Demolition. Look at Building 7 for God sakes.”
“What is it they do not want the public to know?”
After his retirement, Major General Stubblebine served as the VP for Intelligence Systems with BDM, a major defense contractor. He has brought these experiences to leading-edge medical research and development in collaboration with his wife Rima E. Laibow, M.D.
http://world911truth.org/major-general-albert-stubblebine-towers-fell-down-because-of-explosives/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYou should re-read this quote from your own post. I'll put the important part in capital letters. -
ReplyDelete“I do not believe the free press is free anymore [...] The press is saying what they have been told to say about this. NOW DO I HAVE PROOF ABOUT THIS? NO. BUT I BELIEVE that all the stories that were told about 9/11 were false.”
Make sure to read the capitalized part again.
If he were you, he'd say he had proof.
Albert Stubblebine was the commander general in 1981. Jimmy Carter was president back then, and he's an idiot too. This guy mostly worked under Reagan according to what I read, but thats really beside the point. Just because a guy was commander general or had some job in the CIA doesnt mean he knows the details of 9/11. Thats like saying I should believe Bush because he was president. That's an even higher position than commander general of the army, and Bush says 911 was caused by terrorists. I guess I better take his word for it siince he was in a position of power at one point just like your 1984 commander general. If Stubblebine said he believed the official story of 9/11, you wouldn't care what his former job was, you'd just say he's dumb or a liar. -
And for the record, I believe the TERRORISTS DID plant explosives in the buldings too, but our government didn't realize that until their report was already published and they didnt want to admit their mistake, probably for good reason. Just because there is explosives in the towers doesnt mean Bush planted them there. Bin Laden most likely planted them there JUST LIKE HE DID IN THE 80's. We've already argued about this. I think what the governemnt hid was out of embarassment and not wanting to show the world how incompetent they are, and you think it was some big plot by our own goverment, which I would believe if it actually made logical sense.
Bush gained nothing from 9/11. All he did was lose approval and get kicked out of office, and is still just as rich as he used to be. And he definitely didn't need 9/11 to be able to go into Iraq. Even ask George the paranoid alien.
I don't have time to comment on all the illogical IQ points u just made so I'll just stick to a couple:
ReplyDeleteYou're right in saying that just because a commander general (mind you that is one of the highest positions in the US Army) comes out and says not to beleive the official 911 report, that that is not proof in itself. But I would place my bets that a man who has held such a position is still in contact with the insiders and can thus still be considered an insider himself.
He most likely has a reputation to keep and he is sticking his neck on the line in saying such things. Now you might want to ask yourself what such a man, who has held one of the highest ranking offices, for the the most powerful country in the world, would have to gain by such an action... I don't think he has anything else to prove to the world.
2nd: you said u beleive the terrorists placed the bombs in the towers. Did you ask yourself how this would be possible?
Do you know how many tons of explosives this would require?
Do you realize the level of access that would be needed to the central pillars of each floor of the building?
Do you think a group of turbanites can get into one of the highest security level buildings in the world with truckloads of explosives, gain access to the most restricted areas, plant the bombs in a such a scientific and synchronized way as a demolition takes, which mind you is very very time-consuming, and pull this all of without anybody noticing?
Take off that tin hat off and wave to the fucking aliens!!
Oh goodie, another weak argument I can tear apart just like the last one about the media.
ReplyDeletehttp://thesyndrumfiles.blogspot.com/2009/06/wake-up-bozo-media-is-controlled.html
With that post I already proved that the media is controlled. I shredded your non-rational absurdities with facts backing up my argument. I’m not going to get into that again. I’m only responding to this to stop you from poisoning the mind of whoever might be reading it with your ignorance. It doesn’t matter if Stubblebine has proof about the press being told what to say, his voice is credible. He was in charge of ALL intelligence and security command of the United States! He doesn’t need to prove it, just like the former director of the CIA, William Colby, doesn’t need to prove it either when he says "The central intelligence agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." Jesse Ventura doesn’t need to prove it when he says CIA agents are placed in every news organization.
I gave you so much damn proof, but you don’t even want proof because you can’t register it. You keep on asking for more proof, more proof…why? When you can’t accept it? I provided enough proof straight from journalists, government officials and declassified CIA operations like Mockingbird.
Ask yourself…what do these people have to gain by saying this?
What about General Wesley Clark and 200 other Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement and Government Officials??
What about
670+ Engineers and Architects
200+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals
400+ Professors Question 9/11
230+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members
200+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals
http://patriotsquestion911.com/
About the explosives, you never believed they were planted! You’ve argued with us about this for months! You bought the official story! Ok, so now you jump on the bandwagon after we found actual thermite explosives and were told by the senior council of the 9/11 Commission that they were told to lie. We now know the BUSH ADMINISTRATION LIED!
I covered the story here:
http://thesyndrumfiles.blogspot.com/2009/04/911-again-you-seriousyou-betcha.html
So now we now explosives were used and we were lied to by our government. What’s the next step? Logically, we need to find out who planted them. I doubt crazy terrorists with long beards, wearing robes and turbines, just waltzed in there and dropped them off. That kind of logic would suite you perfectly. Even if they were undercover, they would have had to enter the building and plant the explosives strategically many times, over and over again throughout the building, to demolish it. It takes months to do something like this, as commercial architect Richard Gage founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth) said in his documentary.
http://thesyndrumfiles.blogspot.com/2009/05/debunk-this-you-zombies.html
The people who planted them had to have access to every area of the building that is required for controlled demolition. If they needed access, they needed to get by security. Who was in charge of security?
MARVIN BUSH!
Bush served on the board of Securacom (since renamed Stratesec). The chairman of the board of Stratesec is Wirt D. Walker III, a cousin of Marvin and George W. Bush. Securacom had contracts to provide security for Dulles International Airport (the airport from which American Airlines Flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon, originated) and the World Trade Center in New York. Securacom's backers include a number of Kuwaitis through a company called KuwAm Corp (Kuwaiti-American Corp.). Stratesec also has Saudi investors.
http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/10-16-03/discussion.cgi.16.html
Lightbulb moment IQ! Is it on??
No, well maybe you should change your name to SQ for Stupidity Quotient. Get your head out of your ass. What’s the matter with you? Are you that naïve to think these things are all coincidences?
SURVEILLANCE TAPES AND MAINTENANCE LOGS ARE AMONG THE MISSING EVIDENCE!
ReplyDeleteThe World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security personnel said yesterday [September 11]. Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday [September 6], bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed. [NY Newsday]
On the weekend of 9/8, 9/9 there was a 'power down' condition in WTC tower 2, the south tower. This power down condition meant there was no electrical supply for approx 36 hrs from floor 50 up... "Of course without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors and many, many 'engineers' coming in and out of the tower."
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911security.html
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0204-06.htm
Now I’m not going to list every major inconsistency and question, because that can be seen in HUNDREDS of 9/11 movies here
http://www.trueworldhistory.info/
…but I will list a few.
Why was Norad told to step down? Why did Norad have training exercises of terrorists flying planes into buildings the same morning?
Why the Bush administrations neo-con think-tank, Project for a New American Century's (PNAC) 2000 document, "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century", call for a New Pearl Harbor?
“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century#.22New_Pearl_Harbor.22
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
It reads in their Statement of Principles
1) Increase an already enormous military budget at the expense of domestic social programs
2) Toppling of regimes resistant to our corporate interests
3) Forcing democracy at the barrel of a gun in regions that have no history of the democratic process
4) Replacing the UN’s role of preserving and extending international order
http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm
Why did Larry Silverstein (then owner of WTC) take out a lease for 99 years in July of 2001 on the WTC, two months before the attack? Larry upped the insurance at that time to $3.5 billion and (presciently) to cover potential hits by airliners flown by "terrorist hijackers"
HE INCLUDED TERRORIST HIJACKERS FLYING A PLANE INTO THE BUILDING AS A POSSIBLE PERIL TO BE COVERED!
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2008/04/374254.shtml
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/silverstein.html
That is highly unusual. I’ve worked for over 20 insurance companies and I’ve never seen a policy with specific coverage for this.
Why were there abnormally high amounts of put options (bets that a stock will fall) placed on United Airlines, Boeing, and American Airlines weeks before the attack?
Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call options… Assuming that 4,000 of the options were bought by people with advance knowledge of the imminent attacks, these “insiders” would have profited by almost $5 million. On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls. Again, there was no news at that point to justify this imbalance;… Again, assuming that 4,000 of these options trades represent “insiders,” they would represent a gain of about $4 million.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115292514221107632.html
WHY DID BUSH APPOINTED CIA DIRECTOR BUZZY KRONGARD, MANAGE AN INVESTMENT FIRM THAT HANDLED PUT OPTIONS ON UNITED AIRLINE STOCK?
ReplyDeleteWhy do so many interrelationships between the CIA and the banking and brokerage world?
A.B. “Buzzy” Krongard – The current Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency is the former Chairman of the investment bank A.B. Brown and former Vice Chairman of Banker’s Trust.
Nora Slatkin – This retired CIA Executive Director also sits on Citibank’s board.
John Deutch - This retired CIA Director from the Clinton Administration currently sits on the board at Citigroup, the nation’s second largest bank, which has been repeatedly and overtly involved in the documented laundering of drug money. This includes Citigroup’s 2001 purchase of a Mexican bank known to launder drug money, Banamex.
Clark Clifford – The National Security Act of 1947 was written by Clark Clifford, a Democratic Party powerhouse, former Secretary of Defense, and one-time advisor to President Harry Truman. In the 1980s, as Chairman of First American Bancshares, Clifford was instrumental in getting the corrupt CIA drug bank BCCI a license to operate on American shores. His profession: Wall Street lawyer and banker.
John Foster and Allen Dulles – These two brothers “designed” the CIA for Clifford. Both were active in intelligence operations during WW II. Allen Dulles was the U.S. Ambassador to Switzerland where he met frequently with Nazi leaders and looked after U.S. investments in Germany. John Foster went on to become Secretary of State under Dwight Eisenhower and Allen went on to serve as CIA Director under Eisenhower and was later fired by JFK. Their professions: partners in the most powerful - to this day - Wall Street law firm of Sullivan, Cromwell.
Bill Casey – Ronald Reagan’s CIA Director and OSS veteran who served as chief wrangler during the Iran-Contra years was, under President Richard Nixon, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. His profession: Wall Street lawyer and stockbroker.
David Doherty - The current Vice President of the New York Stock Exchange for enforcement is the retired General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency.
George Herbert Walker Bush – President from 1989 to January 1993, also served as CIA Director for 13 months from 1976-7. He is now a paid consultant to the Carlyle Group, the 11th largest defense contractor in the nation, which also shares joint investments with the bin Laden family.
Maurice “Hank” Greenburg – The CEO of AIG insurance, manager of the third largest capital investment pool in the world, was floated as a possible CIA Director in 1995. FTW exposed Greenberg’s and AIG’s long connection to CIA drug trafficking and covert operations in a two-part series that was interrupted just prior to the attacks of September 11. AIG’s stock has bounced back remarkably well since the attacks.
One wonders how much damning evidence is necessary to respond to what is now irrefutable proof that CIA knew about the attacks and did not stop them. Whatever our government is doing, whatever the CIA is doing, it is clearly NOT in the interests of the American people, especially those who died on September 11.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.hereinreality.com/insidertrading.html
False Flag operations have been used to get us into every major war since our country’s inception. This is no different! Study some history for Christ sake.
Heard of OPERATION NORTHWOODS? It’s declassified false flag operation of terrorist acts to be committed against the U.S. as a pretext to military action against Cuba's communist government !
This document, titled “Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba” was provided by the JCS to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on March 13, 1962, as the key component of Northwoods. Written in response to a request from the Chief of the Cuba Project, Col. Edward Lansdale, the Top Secret memorandum describes U.S. plans to covertly engineer various pretexts that would justify a U.S. invasion of Cuba. These proposals - part of a secret anti-Castro program known as Operation Mongoose - included staging the assassinations of Cubans living in the United States, developing a fake “Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington,” including “sink[ing] a boatload of Cuban refugees (real or simulated),” faking a Cuban airforce attack on a civilian jetliner, and concocting a “Remember the Maine” incident by blowing up a U.S. ship in Cuban waters and then blaming the incident on Cuban sabotage.
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/
Osama and Al Qaeda could not and did not do this alone. The Bush administration was clearly involved. You got to be a complete imbecile if you can’t see this.
Change comes with people like you realizing the lies and changing their thinking. By analyzing the flagrant connections between events you can do that. I know for a fact that you don’t, because months later we’re still having this debate after showing you loads of evidence. You exhibit this behavior with anything you don’t agree on. You are incapable of looking at hard evidence. This tells me that you are not able to learn anything. If you’re such a bright guy IQ, show us you’re worthy of that name…or we’ll just call you SQ from now on.
Fine, call me SQ, I'll call you Zoltard.
ReplyDeleteI just want to respond to the Pod comment about how impossible it would have been for Bin Laden to plant explosives in the building. Why wasn't it impossible when he did the exact same thing in the 80's? Seems to me that it didn't work out the way he wanted, so he added planes on his next try. Thats just common sense.
Was there a government cover up? Of course! They are covering up how vunerable we are and how incompetent they are. They do not want that information to get get out to the rest of the world. And to me it's just common sense. I don't need to post links to a bunch of CIA and goverment people that agree with me.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAlso, the thing is, if any of your "evidence" was actuallty accurate, you wouldn't have heard it. The government and the media they control would've covered it up. Alex jones' site would be shut down and he would be in jail before he even got his first 10 followers.
ReplyDeleteoh, and Cheney would probably nominate himself as supreme leader of our nation, and you 2 would be in jail too. You would've never heard of Ron Paul, and your commander general and CIA guy would have mysteriously disappeared or been charged with treason.
You guys just live in a fantasy world.