"The only chance we have as a country right now is for Osama bin Laden to deploy and detonate a major weapon in the United States."
"Only Osama can execute an attack which will force Americans to demand that their government protect them effectively, consistently, and with as much violence as necessary."
So let me get this straight....another 9/11 is needed, more Americans have to die and more of our rights have to be taken away in order for us to be saved. BULLSHIT!
And how could Glen Beck just sit back and agree with him?? I think I've lost all respect for him.
Speaking about rights, Scheuer confirms that the government wants to move against the 2nd Ammendement and take our guns away.
John Stewart Blasts Scheuer And Beck For Promoting The Slaughter Of Americans
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Osama bin Laden Needs to Attack America | ||||
| ||||
So you think Glen Beck is just an evil person who wants Americans to die?
ReplyDeleteThe funny thing is, I want conservatives to drop off the face of the planet. I dislike them as much as liberals, but you are SO liberal and so influenced by your media, (the government controlled media including jon stewart) that when Jon Stewart says something, you blindly agree, and it forces me to defend the conservatives.
If we had another 9/11 type incident, we would have the green light to do what we did in Iraq. Iraq has 1 less dictator and the people are happier. That country is much better off now, and less dangerous to us. Even super liberals would have to agree with that. If we left him in power he might've nuked us eventually. You're fooling yourself if you think Sadamn was a nice guy who liked us and would never try to get ahold of a nuclear weapon and hurt America, and nieve if you think he never would have the ability. The truth is, the longer these middle east dictators stay in power, the closer we are to destruction, because they hate us and technology keeps advancing more and more.
How many deaths came from 9/11 and Iraq? Maybe 100,000?
So you'd rather nothing happen, we just sit until North Korea and Iran succeed with their nuclear goals. How many deaths is that? 100,000,000 or so?
I've been saying for a long time, that I hope some terrorist orchastrates another 9/11 type event. And I hope it comes from Iran so we have an excuse to destroy them.
Now to you that means I would set up some conspiracy to make it happen if I was president. But a conspiracy isn't needed to make it happen. There are plenty of wackos like Bin Laden around. You just have to wait.
Ever seen "Fail Safe"? You should watch that movie. The US government had to kill millions of people to save the world from a nuclear war that would have killed a billion people. You would've been against the million lives being lost, and perfer that a billion were lost. Right? Thats what you're basically saying now.
I'm sure you'll answer this with some ranting, raving, and insulting, but seriously, you think me and Glen Beck and others who bring this up really want americans to die? You don't think we think it's a "fail safe" situation?
I'm not looking forward to the day when we get nuked by Iran and North Korea. I'd rather some big event happen before then so we have an excuse to remove the dictators from those countries just like we did in Iraq.
The way they said it sounded so politically incorrect, but Jon Stewart acts like the only reason the conservatives want another 9/11, is for their "national security agenda".
Their agenda to keep our country from having nuclear bombs dropped on it? I like that agenda.
The sad thing, is that because of the super liberals, we need another 9/11. The conservatives would take out Iran right now without needing any extra outrage from a 9/11 event. But half the country is liberals, so we can't just take out Iran. We need another 9/11 first. Get it?
I think what Glen Beck was really saying is "We need Bin Laden to attack us again, because the liberals will never let us stop the bad dictators otherwise. They just want to sit and wait for us to get nuked."
"Iraq has one less dictator. The people are happier. That country is much better of now and less dangerous to us"
ReplyDeleteAre the people really happier or better off with foreign troops on their soil? No infrastructure, bombed roads and buildings, few places with running water, looted museums, and different warlords controlling different parts of the country? And are they really less dangerous to us after we killed over 1,000,000 of their people? How many new terrorist were bred? How many people now hate the US even more for killing their family members?
Even the superconservatives would have to be pretty ignorant to believe we are now safer.
"If we left him in power, he might have nuked us eventually" - He never even had the bomb. If he did, he wouldn't be able to reach the US. But if he even manages to pull that one off, he would ensure his people's destruction by nuking us or anyone else. A power hungry dictator would never commit suicide.
No country would dare nuke the US or anyone else with a nuke. That is mutually assured destruction. They would only nuke countries without nukes and those that have no allies with nukes. That pretty much rules out any sort nuclear warfare except for one started by the US.
To think that destroying one country, leads to a safer US, is pretty much the most delusional illogical and utterly moronic conception to ever to brainwash americans.
...and for someone who would be willing to give up on their freedoms for the illusion of security I will leave you with a quote from Benjamin Franklin:
"People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security, deserve neither and will lose both"
"No country would dare nuke the US or anyone else with a nuke. That is mutually assured destruction." -
ReplyDeleteYou are assuming that someone like Sadamn Hussein, who murdered his first person when he was 8 years old, is actually sane and thinks rationally. You might be right, but in case you're wrong, I'm glad Sadamn is gone. And yes, I believe Iraqi people are better off and happier now that they get to vote and rebuild their country. Polls always say the citizens are happier, plus I've seen too many Iraqi's talking about how much better it is, and too many Iraqi's who say living under sadamn was terrifying who have stories of him torturing their families, killing anyone who spoke against him and using chemical weapons against his own people, killing thousands of kurds, etc.
"To think that destroying one country, leads to a safer US, is pretty much the most delusional illogical and utterly moronic conception to ever to brainwash americans."
What country did we destroy? Iraq actually has a democratic goverment in place now. It doesnt look like some bombed out hellhole. How do you destroy sand anyway?