Our old buddy Albert Einstein said
CONDEMNATION WITHOUT INVESTIGATION IS THE HIGHEST FORM OF IGNORANCE.
So let's investigate shall we?
Too many people people gobble up the government's story, don't research anything about it and are quick to attack someone who challenges it with an arsenal of information.
I know I'll get a lot of backlash for this, but there seems to be way too much ignorance still about 9/11 and you know I have to speak on it. I typed this up in 10 minutes, real quick like and it's jam packed with, a lot of questions I think everyone has and a few you probably haven't even thought of yet, as well as substantiated evidence backed by numerous sources, to give credence to my point. I don't claim to know everything about what happened, not by any means. I've always thought the whole thing was bogus.
I've been curious about the details since it happened and I've read enough to know we've been lied to, big time!
I'm not trying to start a new conspiracy theory. I'm rejecting the official conspiracy theory given to us by the government.
Let me start with this
If you believe the official fable the government handed out, according to these polls you are part of the minority.
In a 2004 CNN poll on Anderson Cooper, 89% of the people believe there was a government cover up.
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041111195501242
In an MSNBC poll, 67% of the people believe the government was involved
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14727720
In a New York Times and CBS poll, only 16% of the people believe Bush was telling the truth
http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/13469
In a 2004 Zogby poll, half of New Yorkers believe US leaders had forehand knowledge
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.cfm?ID=855
Radio Poll: 85% Of Canadians Believe 9/11 Inside Job
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/September2006/120906_b_Poll.htm
Too many people simply do not know what happened because they just haven't been exposed to the information. Too many people also think they already know everything and have a set belief system, that when challenged they have a tendency to say things like "Ohhh that can't be, our government would never do that!", "That only happens in third world countries!", "That's impossible, I would of heard it by now!" Bla blabiddy bla bla. The biggest personal disservice one can do is not keeping an open mind. I know for some it's difficult to imagine our government played a hand in this, but false flag operations and government sponsored terror are not new concepts and have been done in the past. False flag operations have been used to get us into every major war since our country's inception. This is no different! For those of you who do not know what a false flag operation is...
False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities.
Some examples
The planned, but never executed, 1962 Operation Northwoods plot by the U.S. Department of Defense for a war with Cuba involved scenarios such as hijacking a passenger plane, sinking a U.S. ship, burning crops and blaming such actions on Cuba. It was authored by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, nixed by John F. Kennedy, came to light through the Freedom of Information Act and was publicized by James Bamford.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag#Examples_of_false_flag_attacks_as_pretexts_for_war
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1
This document, titled "Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba" was provided by the JCS to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on March 13, 1962, as the key component of Northwoods. Written in response to a request from the Chief of the Cuba Project, Col. Edward Lansdale, the Top Secret memorandum describes U.S. plans to covertly engineer various pretexts that would justify a U.S. invasion of Cuba. These proposals - part of a secret anti-Castro program known as Operation Mongoose - included staging the assassinations of Cubans living in the United States, developing a fake "Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington," including "sink[ing] a boatload of Cuban refugees (real or simulated)," faking a Cuban airforce attack on a civilian jetliner, and concocting a "Remember the Maine" incident by blowing up a U.S. ship in Cuban waters and then blaming the incident on Cuban sabotage.
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/ http://911review.com/precedent/century/northwoods.html
WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS A DECLASSIFIED FALSE FLAG OPERATION OF A GOVERNMENT APPROVED PLAN TO MURDER ITS OWN CITIZENS, TO JUSTIFY THE INVASION OF ANOTHER COUNTRY!
This can't be any clearer. If our government was going to go through with this, why is it so damn hard for people to imagine that 9/11 is any different?
More excellent examples:
Hitler and the Nazi's were involved in burning down the German parliament, The Reichstag. Hitler in turn immediately blamed the Communists while The Reichstag was still burning. Shortly thereafter he went to war. We blamed Osama and Al Qaeda, shortly thereafter we went to war. A decree entitled, "For the Protection of the People and the State." Justified as a "defensive measure against Communist acts of violence endangering the state," the decree suspended the constitutional guarantees pertaining to civil liberties in Germany and enabled the government to spy on its people and take away their rights. It stated:
"Restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press; on the rights of assembly and association; and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic and telephonic communications and warrants for house searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed." Looks kinda like the Patriot Act, huh?
Two weeks after the Reichstag fire, Hitler requested the Reichstag to temporarily delegate its powers to him so that he could adequately deal with the crisis. Then "Enabling Act" made Hitler dictator of Germany, freed of all legislative and constitutional constraints.
The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, signed on May 9, 2007 declares that in the event of a "catastrophic event", George Bush (now Obama) can become what is best described as "a dictator": "The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government." This directive, completely unnoticed by the media, and given no scrutiny by Congress, literally gives the White House unprecedented dictatorial power over the government and the country, bypassing the US Congress and obliterating the separation of powers. The directive also placed the Secretary of Homeland Security in charge of domestic "security".
Why would Hitler and his associates turn a blind eye to an impending terrorist attack on their national congressional building or actually assist with such a horrific deed? Because they knew what government officials have known throughout history - that during extreme national emergencies, people are most scared and thus much more willing to surrender their liberties in return for "security." The government and special interests then have a green light to carry out their agendas. And that's exactly what happened during the Reichstag terrorist crisis and our terrorist crisis 9/11. Consider the similarities.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag http://www.britannica.com/blogs/2007/03/the-reichstag-fire-and-the-enabling-act/
http://www.oilempire.us/reichstag-fire.html
Have we forgotten about the Gulf of Tonkin incident?
The NSA deliberately distorted the intelligence reports to make it look like we got attacked, so we could start the war in Vietnam. This is now declassified and it is a known fact.
http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/declass/gulf_of_tonkin/index.shtml
What about WWII?
Well we all know by now that Pearl Harbor was provoked and known well in advance. Roosevelt's policy toward Japan was one of systematic pressure to force the Japanese imperialists to commit the overt act which would touch off a war explosion. Roosevelt was obliged to pursue this strategy in order to be able to brand Japan as the aggressor and stampede the people of the United States into a war to which a majority of the nation had been steadfastly opposed. The peace-loving President had assured the American people that their sons would not be sent to fight in foreign wars. This made it necessary that the United States should be attacked so that the drive of American imperialism for mastery of the Pacific could be presented in the guise of a war of national defense and survival.
Admiral Robert Theobald, the Commander of all destroyers at Pearl Harbor, wrote a book entitled 'The Final Secret of Pearl Harbor', in which he detailed his conclusions about the "surprise attack." He wrote:
1.President Roosevelt forced Japan to war and enticed them to initiate hostilities by holding the
Pacific fleet in Hawaiian waters as an invitation to that attack;
2.The plans to use Pearl Harbor as the bait started in June, 1940;
3.War with Japan meant war with Germany; and
4.Roosevelt, Marshall and Stark knew about Pearl Harbor 21 hours before the attack.
http://www.rationalrevolution.net/war/fdr_provoked_the_japanese_attack.htm
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/20/001.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_Harbor_advance-knowledge_debate
What about WWI?
International bankers wanted in on WWI for profit and the Lucitainia was deliberately sent into German waters. Robert Lansing, the Assistant Secretary of State, is on record as stating:
"We must educate the public gradually - draw it along to the point where it will be willing to go into the war."
Even though Wilson proclaimed America's neutrality in the European War, in accordance with the prior admonitions of George Washington, his government was secretly plotting to involve the American people by having the Lusitania sunk. This was made public in the book 'The Intimate Papers of Colonel House', written by a supporter of the Colonel, who recorded a conversation between Colonel House and Sir Edward Grey of England, the Foreign Secretary of England:
Grey: What will America do if the Germans sink an ocean liner with American passengers on board?
House: I believe that a flame of indignation would sweep the United States and that by itself would be sufficient to carry us into the war.
Colonel House convinced President Wilson that the United States should enter World War I.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_M._House
http://books.google.com/books?id=-3EShjGGNpUC&dq=The+Intimate+Papers+of+Colonel+House,&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=g3knM-8p4g&sig=qIH0o1gogwuHlw2zgYcWq4z4_ac&hl=en&ei=ENdKSpvEFIrZlAeM0-DfDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4
Now comes the fun part
FACT: NEVER BEFORE IN HISTORY HAS A STEEL REINFORCED BUILDING FALLEN DUE TO FIRE!
ON SEPTEMER 11TH 3 BUILDINGS FELL DUE TO FIRE IN A MATTER OF HOURS
What are the odds of that happening?
Here are some examples of high-rise fires that were far more severe than those in the WTC buildings. In these precedents, the fires consumed multiple floors, produced extensive window breakage, exhibited large areas of emergent flames, and went on for several hours. The fires in the WTC towers did none of these things.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html
"THE BUILDINGS COULD SUSTAIN MULTIPLE IMPACTS OF JETLINERS"
Manager of WTC Construction & Project Management, Frank DeMartini
WHAT ABOUT BUILDING 7?
It didn't get hit with any planes at and it is not even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.
Larry Silverstein (then owner) admitted having the building "pulled" or demolished.
John Kerry confirmed that
The thing is he said they did it because it posed a danger. It takes weeks to wire a building like that...hmmm.....here's the light bulb moment!
Why did Larry Silverstein take out a lease for 99 years in July of 2001 on the WTC, two months before the attack? Larry upped the insurance at that time to $3.5 billion and (presciently) to cover potential hits by airliners flown by "terrorist hijackers"
HE INCLUDED TERRORIST HIJACKERS FLYING A PLANE INTO THE BUILDING AS A POSSIBLE PERIL TO BE COVERED!
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2008/04/374254.shtml http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/silverstein.html
That is highly unusual. I've worked for over 20 insurance companies and I've never seen a policy with specific coverage for this.
WHY DID BBC REPORT BUILDING 7 COLLAPSED 20 MINUTES BEFORE IT DID?
The transmission conveniently gets cut moments before the building does "collapse". This video demonstrates that there were people in the know about the controlled demolition that was to take place and the story was leaked early.
The question whether explosives were used or not has already been answered. We now know that planes did not bring down the towers. It's not a question anymore. Nano-thermite explosives were discovered in the dust. 8 scientists from premier universities around the world wrote a paper on it, here:
http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/openaccess2.htm
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/thermite.htm
YOU WANT SOME MORE SCIENCE?
How about over 700 architects and structural engineers giving you the latest evidence of controlled demolition with the use of explosives? No conspiracy theories here, just pure physics for all you scientists out there.
YOU WANT SOME MORE SCIENCE?
How about over 700 architects and structural engineers giving you the latest evidence of controlled demolition with the use of explosives? No conspiracy theories here, just pure physics for all you scientists out there.
No comments:
Post a Comment